Marca |
HTC |
---|---|
Contém líquido |
Não |
EAN |
0821793053154 ,0821793052614 |
Número do modelo |
99HASZ000-00 |
Peso do produto |
5,9 Kilograms |
Conexões |
Bluetooth |
Tem botões programáveis |
Não |
Bateria recarregável |
Sim |
Tem foco automático |
Não |
Tecnologia de conexão |
Bluetooth |
Fabricante |
HTC |
Padrão de conexão sem fio |
Bluetooth |
Funciona com baterias |
Sim |
Baterias inclusas |
Sim |
Tamanho da tela |
6 Polegadas |
Peças para montagem |
Controlador |
Tipo Do Produto |
Videogame |
Número da peça |
99HASZ011-00 |
Modelo |
99HASZ000-00 |
Dimensões do produto |
53,09 x 34,54 x 18,54 cm ,5,9 Quilogramas |
![](https://www.cybermicro.com.br/wp-content/themes/woodmart/images/lazy.png)
MM –
Despite having the most accurate tracking and best visuals of any VR device on the market, the Vive Pro 2 is horribly fragile and unwieldy, in terms of weight, sheer number of cables and extra devices, and setup.
The base stations provide slightly better tracking, at the expense of two extra power plugins and clever placement that secures them from physical bumps. The headset itself has a proxy station, which needs *yet another* power plug, and requires the typical USB + display plugin to the computer, which it combines into a proprietary cord to the HMD. This cord is unusually heavyweight, which is actually a problem in VR, because you can feel it, and are likely to trip on it, as it snakes around on the ground around you. It you step on it too much, you can’t simply run out to the store and replace it, because it’s proprietary!
I can’t recommend this headset, in lieu of owning a Samsung Odyssey. The Odyssey is just plain superior, even if the resolution is only 1440p per eye, rather than 2448p. If you can find an Odyssey+, or a HP Reverb G2 HMD (which is 2160p per eye, but none of the extra device nonsense), you’ll be doing yourself a big favor — the extra rez of the Vive Pro 2 just isn’t worth *that* much trouble.
Day Krolik III –
This is the first review I have ever written on Amazon after purchasing probably hundreds of products. I truly hope it will help others.
I am an experienced VR user, having bought the Oculus Rift shortly after its introduction in 2016 and moved up to the Rift S in 2019. I almost exclusively use VR for auto racing and flight sims. My computer is an i9-7980XE with an Nvidia GTX 2080ti, which should be able to exploit the capabilities of just about any VR rig.
With its superior resolution, I thought I would try to step up to the Vive Pro 2. I read at least 100 reviews before taking the plunge. I was very disappointed. The improved resolution reduces the “screen door effect” somewhat, but in terms of overall image and clarity, the Vive Pro 2 was no better than my Rift S (which I do super sample at 1.7). The focal “sweet spot” seemed smaller and the clarity of the image at a distance (crucial for racing and flight sims) actually seemed somewhat worse.
The Pro 2 is indeed expensive. I found it heavier and less comfortable than the Rift S and, of course, it requires base stations, which the Oculus does not.
I have returned the Vive Pro 2. It may be a good unit for uses other than racing or flight sims. Those who are buying for the first time may want to consider the Oculus Quest2 or HP Reverb G2. Generally though, it seems that those of us who wish to upgrade should wait for the next generation of headsets, hopefully with better lenses than the Fresnel lenses still used in the Vive Pro 2.
BanjoJeff –
Headset is good quality. Image is sharp in the sweet spot which is pretty small. VR technology is not where I tought it was. If you want to get into VR, I’d wait for next gen or get Valve INDEX. The resolution itself isn’t worth the price in my opinion. I’m not planning on returning it but i’d say it’s not worth full price.